QATestLab and Allure: Ecommerce platform functional testing case analysed
Verdict: what is checkable
The evidence grade (this site's label for how a case is sourced: primary with client or press confirmation, secondary when vendor-hosted only.) is secondary: the only source is the vendor's own page; the case publishes no metric, so nothing in it can be checked as a figure. [ev-1192]
Client profile as published
- Client
- Allure
- Segment
- Specialty retail
- Region
- not stated in the source
- Channels
- ecommerce
- Size indicators
The store has a large variety of sunglasses and optical glasses of different brands.
The client description and size indicators are quoted from the source; segment, region and channels are this site's classification. [ev-1192]
Systems in scope
- Ecommerce platform (WordPress): named in the body text ("WordPress store")
Where the source names each system is quoted or summarised from the case page. [ev-1192]
Problem as stated
The page lists the agency Loginaut as the customer and the Allure glasses store, built on WordPress, as the site under test. The store's functions and design had to be checked in several browsers and on Android, iOS and Windows Phone devices, and pages had to match templates the customer supplied. [ev-1192]
Particular attention was paid to testing of the cart and adaptive page-proofs.(quoted from the source)
Approach
- Testing types
- functional and mobile (main scope: functional)
- Team shape
- 1 test engineer
- Duration
- 95 hours
- Engagement model
- not stated
- Tooling named in the source
- Jira, VMware Workstation
Metrics claimed
The case publishes no metric.
What the case does not say
- Baseline before the engagement.
- Cost.
- Whether the client is still a client.
- Date of the work.
Reading notes for a buyer
This case speaks to the scenario “First outsourced QA team for a mid-size retailer” and feeds dimension D1 (Retail case study evidence) of the methodology. A question to put to QATestLab:
How many bugs did the testing hours produce in the customer's tracker, and how many of them were in the cart? [ev-1192]
Source and verification
- Source
- Allure: men's and women's glasses online store
- Published
- not dated by the vendor
- Verified
- 2026-10-30
- Evidence grade
- secondary
- Corroborating sources
- none found
| Id | Claim | Source | Class | Grade | Published | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ev-1192 | Allure: men's and women's glasses online store | Allure: men's and women's glasses online store | vendor-case-study | secondary | 2026-10-30 |
Vendor profile: QATestLab. System facet: Ecommerce platform testing vendors.
Positions on this page are computed from the methodology published at /methodology/ and from the evidence records linked on this page. Case study figures are the vendor's or the client's claims as published at the linked source; the "verifiable" column states what this site could check. The site does not recommend vendors, does not accept paid placement and does not publish rates. Last computed: 2026-11-03.
Published by the editor of retailqavendors.com. Last reviewed .